00:30:11 I'd be open to running a nitter instance if a) they don't need much resources and b) I don't need like a special IP address or anything to avoid ratelimits. 00:34:36 there was a memory leak issue if you had RSS enabled that i saw recently but other than that not sure 00:35:15 not too sure if 'the self-appointed god of X' will go after scrapers like nitter-hosts though... 01:05:23 TheTechRobo don't do it 01:05:30 just let twitter die :-) 01:07:45 *pew pew* 01:08:45 whenever twitter breaks nitter breaks 01:21:35 If we could get Anthrogenica into the WBM, that would be nice for accessibility reasons, but barring that (which seems done for us by CF) this looks like it suffices IMO 04:42:50 Microsoft announced they are removing the Xbox Companion App at the end of the month. Got to thinking, has there been any effort to archive Windows Store apps - at least free ones? Looks like someone archived at least some Windows 8 apps - but not sure how complete it is. https://archive.org/details/Win8AppxArchive 04:58:51 OrIdow6 edited Site exploration (+493, Using WBM CDX): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50323&oldid=49344 05:01:51 OrIdow6 edited Site exploration (+174, /* Common Crawl Index */ The CC incident in Imgur): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50324&oldid=50323 05:12:56 i did wonder what happened with commoncrawl 05:28:56 OrIdow6 edited Tracker (-262, General cleanup, remove outdated info. IMO if…): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50325&oldid=49757 05:30:04 Does anybody know if there is any way to pull recordings off of a foxtel box? channel 804 has been shut down and I have some content recorded from it before it closed 05:30:57 OrIdow6 edited Dev/Tracker (+2, The present state of things): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50326&oldid=48528 05:32:52 hopefully it's opensourced one day 05:32:58 i think it's just a time thing 05:33:57 OrIdow6 edited Tracker (+313, /* History */ My personal experience): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50327&oldid=50325 05:34:57 OrIdow6 edited Tracker (+3, /* History */): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50328&oldid=50327 05:35:22 If this info is wrong feel free to correct, at any rate I think it's more accurate than what was there previously 05:36:57 :) i do like the cleaning of the old cruft 05:37:28 It feels nice 05:37:28 i want to throw the projects page into the paper shredder 05:37:33 but ugh maybe one day 05:37:37 Lots of deletion that needs to happen 05:37:44 i'll get really drunk and fuck it up so that it's somewhat readable 05:37:51 s/readable/current/ 05:37:58 OrIdow6 edited Tracker (-24, Get rid of section header for the lede): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50329&oldid=50328 05:38:18 I guess it's kind of inevitable that an organization about saving internet history doesn't like to delete stuff off its own wiki 05:38:25 https://transfer.archivete.am/inline/sT6Cd/projects.png 05:38:29 true :p 05:38:39 i guess it can be better formatted into a history section if reallly needed 05:39:23 Yeah 05:40:52 I'm still hoping that one day we can implement the issue tracker-wiki sync idea 05:42:59 FireonLive edited Current Projects (-494, remove projects that have been here for 30d): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50330&oldid=50274 05:46:42 oh like automated wiki updates based on tracker projects? 05:46:47 would be interesting 05:48:04 (not that "Projects" isn't important - it would be nice to have a list of all the work AT has done) 05:48:34 Yeah 05:48:56 And also since we could have assignees for stuff etc 05:49:55 there is a management structure listed in https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/Dev/Project_Management 05:50:07 it's a little loosey goosey in reality 05:50:16 but the general idea is there 05:52:01 FireonLive edited WikiTeam (+17, specify "archiving_type"): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50331&oldid=50010 05:52:07 Yeah 05:52:33 I think mostly what has happened since was written is that the first 3 roles have had their jobs shifted around 05:53:01 FireonLive edited WikiTeam (-17, Undo revision 50331 by…): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50332&oldid=50331 05:53:07 mm 05:56:01 OrIdow6 edited Rewind Project (+141, Warrior projects are usually accessible through…): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50333&oldid=30378 06:21:06 FireonLive edited Wikidata (+29, fix IA url): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50334&oldid=46623 06:22:43 if you want some fun: https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/Special:Random 06:27:09 https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/Category:Years hmmm; seems sort of out of scope 06:27:23 ("Internet History" on the AT wiki) 06:27:29 I kinda wish we had a way to delete pages but leave the history open to everyone 06:28:06 You could move them to a different namespace for junk 06:29:51 Nice idea, actually 06:31:08 FireonLive edited ArchiveBot/Microsoft people/list (+28, add textslashplain.com (Eric Lawrence)): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50335&oldid=35266 06:31:31 "Obsolete:" could be the name 06:31:38 "Junk" is a bit.... terse. 06:32:03 or "Archived" 06:32:36 then again, archived on archive team wiki could be confusing :p 06:43:06 also for "Hiatus / Missed the Mark" on the main page (Current_Projects) we probably don't need to flog ourselves forever in terms of 'missed the mark' 06:43:30 for true 'hiatus' perhaps that's fine (maybe just for stuff recently on hiatus?) 06:43:55 fireonlive you dont think we dont do this for the gluttony of punishment? 06:44:14 put some makeup on and shine :D 06:44:37 fireonlive: um yes queen skinny legend versace boots the house down slay queen hunty mama and oop daddy work charli xcx snatch my wig 06:44:40 .. 06:44:41 flashfire42: um yes queen skinny legend versace boots the house down slay queen hunty mama and oop daddy work charli xcx snatch my wig 06:44:56 :p 06:45:07 Did you just have a stroke? 06:45:31 😂 06:47:47 strike recently on hiatus from the record, but 'missed the mark' is something that could go 06:47:59 also strike versace from the record 09:11:54 I guess we also have the historical content template, but it kinda seems cleaner to move stuff 11:48:07 OrIdow6 edited Finding subdomains (-702, Get rid of stuff redundant with [[Discovery]]): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50336&oldid=50134 11:50:07 OrIdow6 edited Site exploration (+61, A bit I moved from [[Finding subdomains]]): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50337&oldid=50324 11:57:09 OrIdow6 edited Porn (-40, Eroshare like to internal): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50338&oldid=50322 13:33:25 PaulWise edited Finding subdomains (+42, reference the Discovery and Site exploration…): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50339&oldid=50336 13:39:27 PaulWise edited Finding subdomains (-18, Discovery is a redirect): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50340&oldid=50339 13:42:27 PaulWise edited Site exploration (-78, add some things, drop stuff that is already in…): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50341&oldid=50337 13:45:27 PaulWise edited Site exploration (-3, Google changed their maximum amount of search…): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50342&oldid=50341 13:52:18 Yeah, moving pages that are purely of historical value to an 'Obsolete' namespace sounds good to me. And if we recycle the now-redirected page name, we should probably add a link (with a template) to the obsolete page. 13:52:53 > much of the wiki looks like a hoarder's basement 13:52:55 :-) 13:59:30 PaulWise edited Site exploration (+467, add cdx subdomain enumeration method deleted…): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50343&oldid=50342 14:01:30 PaulWise edited Site exploration (+36, missed a sentence fragment): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50344&oldid=50343 15:53:51 FireonLive edited Current Projects (-223, remove Classic Google Sites): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50345&oldid=50330 15:57:52 FireonLive edited Google Sites (+72, mark Classic Google Sites as complete, service…): https://wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=50346&oldid=49367 18:25:12 (Cross-post from #internetarchive.bak) I wrote down some ideas for IA.BAK over IPFS if anyone's interested: https://gist.github.com/tomodachi94/f8fbaea1138f69631385083bccc5f3ef 21:17:22 Hi! 21:17:22 Do you have google groups archives? 21:18:00 I see that [its page on the wiki](https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/Google_Groups) is empty and is listed on the "missed the mark category", but wanted to make sure 21:18:24 specifically I'm in search of archives for the https://groups.google.com/forum/feed/openstreetmap-hungary group 21:19:20 I assume that any archives would be on web.archive.org, but I don't know anything about google groups specifically 21:43:24 I think something is not right 21:43:35 is it possible that there were 2 different google groups? 21:43:52 I've found this: https://archive.org/details/archiveteam-googlegroups 21:43:52 on this page: https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/Google_Groups_Files 21:44:34 but this is from 2012, when it was shut down, and it does not contain what I'm searching (it has the group with the exact name I search, but no content) 21:46:12 but I've found multiple references to it from later than this date (like this from 2013: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/halott-forum-forum-is-dead/64789) that implies that it still existed for some years 21:46:45 also, an archive of the topic list page of it from 2015: https://archive.li/y7xz6 22:03:14 I think Google Groips Files was something separate 23:03:08 “Bath Abbey has launched a new website which will provide information on the almost 1,500 commemorative wall tablets and gravestones at the historic site.” https://www.bathecho.co.uk/news/community/bath-abbey-website-directory-memorials-103020/ 23:03:44 https://www.bathabbeymemorials.org.uk/ - seems a bit overloaded now.. but it is a wordpress site with “funding provided by”.. maybe not around forever 23:04:36 might be good to chuck in the AB or something in a couple weeks :3 23:06:14 i don't suppose they even let you make brass rubbings anymore? 23:11:37 (/gen) What does the BS in “archive-team-bs” stand for after all? xD 23:13:31 some say "bikeshed", some say "bullshit" 23:13:37 not sure which is official ;) 23:14:08 I think it's bikeshed though, after https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bikeshedding 23:41:23 "some say "bikeshed", some say "..." <- Yeah that's why I was so confused 23:41:37 Unless this chat tends to have a lot of BS 23:43:01 "I think it's bikeshed though..." <- Up there with “when you're up to the neck in alligators it's hard to remember you were going to drain the swamp”, ig?