-
fireonlive
05:06:08 PM -ChanServ- #🔥 is now registered to fireonlive. < i propose all future AT project channels are henceforth just an emoji or a string of emoji
-
fireonlive
:3
-
arkiver
+1, i wouldn't even know how to use emojis other than copying them off the unicode site :P
-
fireonlive
:D
-
fireonlive
haha
-
fireonlive
uh no one whois me
-
fireonlive
i'm too lazy to set modes
-
h2ibot
Ufarwisan edited Miraheze (+58, linkify ia for clarity):
wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=49991&oldid=49988
-
Ryz
-
masterx244|m
arkiver: crossreferencing the i.redd.it images against the CDX api atm, [J]AA gave me a pointer on how to pull the data down efficiently
-
rktk
Ryz, probably no current project given mega links often contain a lot of copyright content, but beyond that they need the complete URL with the ID and Key, which sometimes is not done by someone sharing a link
-
rktk
also, mega.nz has a 5GB/day limit per IP address even with free accounts, so it makes it prohibitively harder to do without a premium account
-
rktk
you could use MegaBasterd as a downloader manager but it's not really convenient if you want to automate something
-
rktk
(speaking all from my experience trying to grab a bunch of mega links... i gave up)
-
masterx244|m
and due to how mega works its impossible to wayback, too
-
masterx244|m
its a steaming pile of javascript. Ryz: probably the simplest to manually mirror the files itself to the IA if they are lost media or similarly important
-
rktk
^ that's pretty much the only way, using your system as an intermediary
-
rktk
and, well, having a premium account.
-
rktk
even with a Pro 1 account you only get 2TB of transfer a month
-
rktk
their flexi plan offers the ability to get like 100TB + but it really adds up in price, that said if you're desperate to grab a ton of content, it's like 260 EUR for 100TB of transfer
-
rktk
-
rktk
it's a PAYG so it would be what you use
-
rktk
oh and "For Free users, the amount of data that can be downloaded from their IP in six hours is limited. " so it's 5GB/IP/6hrs
-
albertlarsan68
Are Tor exit relays blocked?
-
rktk
I don't think so, but you'll have slow transfer speeds, and you'd have to restart your local tor instance to force a exit node change, once you hit a limit
-
rktk
like systemctl restart tor sorta thing
-
rktk
also because it's a tor exit node, someone else may or probably did the same thing 6 hrs before you
-
rktk
same with VPNs I would assume. it's a gamble
-
albertlarsan68
Possibly worse with VPNs, they may have less IP end points.
-
rktk
yes exactly
-
rktk
in general it's cases like this where... you should just pay to transfer a bunch of shit. which sucks but archival does come with costs at some point
-
h2ibot
-
h2ibot
JustAnotherArchivist edited Deathwatch (+66, /* 2023 */ Add link to official PConline BBS…):
wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=49993&oldid=49992
-
imer
mega seems to do ipv6, so that might be a possibility
-
imer
depending on how they limit it
-
albertlarsan68
Would it be possible they limit on /64 ranges?
-
albertlarsan68
Or even worse, /48
-
albertlarsan68
It would replicate the NAT behaviour of IPv4, one IP per household/business
-
JAA
Getting larger IPv6 blocks is a lot easier/cheaper than getting large IPv4 blocks though.
-
imer
^
-
dave
if mega have any good network engineers, they'll be limiting by IPv6 /64 at least, and possibly also by /56 and /48 since those are common delegations in residential IPv6 internet
-
imer
i'd guess some of the people here would have access to one or more /32's they could borrow a good distribution of ips from
-
h2ibot
Hans5958 edited URLTeam (-2999, Checking round on 2023-06-22):
wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=49994&oldid=49941
-
h2ibot
Hans5958 edited URLTeam/Dead (+3989, Checking round on 2023-06-22):
wiki.archiveteam.org/?diff=49995&oldid=49812
-
h2ibot
-
arkiver
i dont think we'll be archiving mega soon